Solana trading bot comparison
VS
Maestro vs Sigma (Solana)
Quick verdict
Equal confirmed feature score. The mutually confirmed features do not produce a unique feature leader.
Platform trading fee: Maestro — 1%; Sigma — 0%.
Bot rating summary
- Maestro: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
- Sigma: ★★★★½ 4.6/5 (Very good)
Feature comparison
| Confirmed feature | Maestro | Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| Platform trading fee | 1% | 0% |
| Interface languages | English, Simplified Chinese · Telegram | English, Chinese |
| Limit orders | Yes · Telegram | Yes · Telegram |
| Confirmed access surfaces | Telegram | Telegram, Web |
Fees comparison
Maestro fees
Maestro charges a product-wide 1% fee on successful manual and automated buys and sells. Network gas, priority fees or builder tips, DEX/protocol costs and bridge-provider fees are separate. Ordinary wallet transfers have no Maestro trading fee.
Sigma: 0%
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
Maestro on Solana
Solana Anti-MEV is optional, with documented Jito, Temporal and NextBlock routing. Gas Delta is a separate priority-fee control. Manual slippage controls are confirmed on Solana. Priority fees are separate from Maestro’s trading fee. AutoSnipe is confirmed in the current Solana selector. The documented Solana sniper scope includes Raydium V4; that does not establish support for every launchpad.
Confirmed controls and integrations
| Confirmed feature | Maestro | Sigma |
|---|---|---|
| MEV protection | Optional Anti-MEV · Telegram | Yes · Web |
| Slippage control | Manual · Telegram | Manual · Web |
| Internal wallets | Yes · Telegram | Yes |
| Multiple wallets | Yes · Telegram | Yes |
| Wallet import | Yes · Telegram | Yes |
The goal of this pro comparison is to surface meaningful product differences, including routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
We do not rank Maestro and Sigma by fixed latency, as real-world execution speed depends on variables such as RPC quality, region, device performance and chain congestion.
Different setups can produce very different outcomes, which is why this comparison emphasizes workflow and tooling instead of theoretical speed metrics.
Review links
Related comparisons
FAQ
Does an unlisted feature mean it is unsupported?
No. A missing value means the available data does not establish support. It is different from an explicit negative value.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.