Solana trading bot comparison
VS
Bloom vs MEVX (Solana)
MEVX edges this Solana comparison because the workflow feels slightly better balanced for day-to-day use.
Quick verdict
MEVX comes out a little stronger here when you look at how the product actually fits into repeated day-to-day use.
Which bot should you choose?
This is one of those matchups where trader fit matters more than broad category labels.
Bloom is usually the stronger match if:
- You want more control over execution, fees and trade settings
- You care about cashback or lower effective trading costs
Choose MEVX if:
- You rely on wallet tracking and trader research
- You want a broader interface workflow across multiple surfaces
- You want stronger built-in discovery and opportunity flow
Bot rating summary
- Bloom: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
- MEVX: ★★★★½ 4.7/5 (Very good)
Feature comparison
| Feature | Bloom | MEVX |
|---|---|---|
| Bot | Bloom Review Open |
MEVX Review Open |
| Description | Hybrid multi-chain trading stack with a Solana bot, EVM bot and browser extension overlay for spot trading, sniping, copy trading, AFK automation, Twitter auto-buy, limit orders and multi-wallet execution. | Unified multi-chain Telegram trading bot with integrated sniping, manual trading, copy trading, DCA, limit orders, and multi-hop routing across Solana and EVM chains, with synchronized Telegram and web app execution. |
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, HyperEVM | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, AVAX, MegaETH, Mantle, Monad, TON, TRON, Sui, Xlayer |
| Best for | Copy Trading, Sniping, Telegram Trading, Multi-Chain Trading, Automation | Token Discovery, Sniping, Manual Trading, Copy Trading, Multi-Chain Trading |
| Interface | Telegram + Extension | Web + PWA + Telegram |
| Languages | English, Chinese Simplified, Russian | English, Chinese Simplified, Portuguese +4 |
| Custody model | Bot Generated | Hybrid |
| Rebate / rewards | 10% cashback | 35% cashback |
| Trading fee | 1% | 0.9% |
| Execution focus | Speed First | Balanced |
| Priority fee control | Advanced | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| MEV protection | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Sniper | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Limit orders | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Token discovery | Integrated | Integrated |
| Copy trading | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Multi-wallet | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Cross-chain workflow | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Mobile experience | Good | Good |
| Preset support | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Editorial score | 4.8/5 | 4.7/5 |
| Beginner friendly | Medium | Medium |
| Setup time | 2 min | 10 min |
| Official links |
Fees comparison
Bloom: 1% | 10% cashback
MEVX: 0.9% | 35% cashback
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
MEVX brings a stronger wallet-intelligence angle than Bloom in this compare.
MEVX has the clearer edge when built-in token discovery matters more than a simpler flow.
Bloom is better equipped for traders who want more control over how orders get executed.
Strengths and weaknesses
Bloom
Strengths
- Copy trading support
- Supports multi-wallet execution
- Some cost reduction beyond the base fee
- Adds browser-extension access
Weaknesses
- Weaker wallet-research layer
- Not as broad in interface coverage
MEVX
Strengths
- Copy trading support
- Supports multi-wallet execution
- Stronger wallet-intelligence layer
- Cashback or fee-rebate upside
Weaknesses
- Slower setup flow
Pro comparison
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
Execution & Speed
| Feature | Bloom | MEVX |
|---|---|---|
| Execution focus | Speed First | Balanced |
| Priority fee control | Advanced | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| Retry handling | Basic | Basic |
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Private transactions | No | No |
Discovery & Intelligence
| Feature | Bloom | MEVX |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery engine | Built-in discovery | Discovery + wallet intelligence |
| Trending tokens | Not available | Yes |
| Launchpad tracking | Pump.fun • Launchlab • Moonshot • Moon It • Boop +1 more | Pump.fun • LetsBONK • Mayhem • Wen Dev • Daos Fun +12 more |
Trading & Automation
| Feature | Bloom | MEVX |
|---|---|---|
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Auto sell | No | Yes |
| DCA orders | No | Yes |
| Sniping support | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | Yes | Yes |
| Preset support | Yes | Yes |
Wallet & Infrastructure
| Feature | Bloom | MEVX |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-wallet trading | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet tracker | No | Yes |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Supported wallets | Internal Wallet | Internal Wallet |
| Interface workflow | Telegram + Extension | Web + PWA + Telegram |
Market Coverage
| Feature | Bloom | MEVX |
|---|---|---|
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, HyperEVM | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, AVAX, MegaETH, Mantle, Monad, TON, TRON, Sui, Xlayer |
| Cross-chain workflow | Yes | Yes |
| Launchpads | Pump Fun • LaunchLab • Moonshot • Moon It • Boop • Dynamic Bc | Pump Fun • LetsBONK • Mayhem • Wen Dev • Daos Fun • Believe • Moon It • Jupiter Studio • Bags • Printr +7 more |
How to read this pro comparison
The goal of this pro comparison is to surface meaningful product differences, including routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
We do not rank Bloom and MEVX by fixed latency, as real-world execution speed depends on variables such as RPC quality, region, device performance and chain congestion.
Different setups can produce very different outcomes, which is why this comparison emphasizes workflow and tooling instead of theoretical speed metrics.
Workflow and trading style
This matchup reads more clearly when viewed through actual usage flow. On Solana, MEVX is better aligned with wallet tracking, address analysis and trader-intelligence usage, while Bloom is less centered on that loop in day-to-day use.
Best choice by trader type
- Bloom: is generally the stronger match if you want more control over execution, fees and trade settings.
- Bloom: is easier to recommend when you care about cashback or lower effective trading costs.
- MEVX: is generally the stronger match if you rely on wallet tracking and trader research.
- MEVX: is easier to recommend when you want a broader interface workflow across multiple surfaces.
Bloom vs MEVX: Which is better?
MEVX makes slightly more sense here as the overall pick because the trading workflow fits together more cleanly. Bloom still remains a workable choice for the right trader.
Review links
Bloom
Hybrid multi-chain trading stack with a Solana bot, EVM bot and browser extension overlay for spot trading, sniping, copy trading, AFK automation, Twitter auto-buy, limit orders and multi-wallet execution.
referral_code: ref_2OO4W19C0G
MEVX
Unified multi-chain Telegram trading bot with integrated sniping, manual trading, copy trading, DCA, limit orders, and multi-hop routing across Solana and EVM chains, with synchronized Telegram and web app execution.
referral_code: Tradingbots
Related comparisons
FAQ
What is the difference between Bloom and MEVX?
This matchup is mostly about differences in routine, feature emphasis and overall trading fit rather than one single standout capability.
Which trading bot is better for beginners?
There is no automatic beginner pick in this comparison. The easier product depends more on the workflow style you find more natural.
Should I use Bloom or MEVX on this chain?
MEVX comes out stronger overall on Solana here, though Bloom can still be the better choice if its routine fits the way you trade more naturally.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.