Solana trading bot comparison
VS
Sigma vs Terminal (Solana)
Compare confirmed Solana controls and product scope. Terminal is the current name of Padre.
Quick verdict
Equal confirmed feature score. The mutually confirmed features do not produce a unique feature leader.
For execution controls · confirmed examples, Sigma lists Slippage, Minimum liquidity, Max price impact, Anti mev mode +3 more confirmed · Web; Terminal lists Priority fee, Slippage, Tip, Mev mode +1 more confirmed · Web.
Bot rating summary
- Sigma: ★★★★½ 4.6/5 (Very good)
- Terminal: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Confirmed feature | Sigma | Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Interface languages | Web: English, Chinese; Telegram: English | Web: English, Chinese |
| DCA orders | Yes | Yes |
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Confirmed access surfaces | Telegram + Web | Web |
| Platform trading fee | 0% | Up to 1% |
| Multiple wallets | Yes | Yes |
Fees comparison
Sigma: 0%
Terminal: Up to 1% advertised; exact universal rate unconfirmed. Network and protocol costs are separate.
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Confirmed controls and integrations
| Confirmed feature | Sigma | Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Execution controls · confirmed examples | Slippage, Minimum liquidity, Max price impact, Anti mev mode +3 more confirmed · Web | Priority fee, Slippage, Tip, Mev mode +1 more confirmed · Web |
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Slippage control | Manual | Manual |
| Order types | Market, Limit, Take profit, Stop loss +1 more confirmed · Telegram | Market, Buy dip, Stop loss, Take profit +2 more confirmed · Web |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Launchpad discovery / execution relations | Bags (filter), Bonk (filter), Pump.fun (filter), Believe (filter) +7 more confirmed | Pump.fun (filter), Bags (filter), Believe (filter), Launchlab (filter) +8 more confirmed |
| Multiple wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet import | Yes | Yes · Web |
| Reward model · product-wide | Points | Cashback |
| Take-profit | Yes | Yes |
| Stop-loss | Yes | Yes |
| Partial take-profit | Not verified | Yes |
| Wallet tracking | Not verified | Yes |
| Priority / gas fee control | Manual | Manual |
| Referral model (product-wide) | Commission | Commission |
| DCA orders | Yes | Yes |
| Auto sell | Not verified | Yes |
| Preset support | Not verified | Yes |
How to read this pro comparison
Rather than surface-level features, this comparison focuses on deeper product differences like routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
Instead of fixed speed rankings, we acknowledge that execution performance for Sigma and Terminal varies depending on setup, RPC infrastructure and network conditions.
Rather than focusing on milliseconds, this comparison looks at how each product behaves in real workflows and trading setups.
Terminal, formerly Padre, advertises a platform trading fee of up to 1%, cashback up to 35% and separate referral commission up to 40%. Exact account rates are unconfirmed. Network and DEX/protocol costs are separate. Only confirmed comparison overlap is shown; an omitted feature does not imply non-support. Discovery filters do not prove trade or sniper integration. Terminal reviewed 29 September 2026.
Review links
Related comparisons
FAQ
Does an unlisted feature mean it is unsupported?
No. A missing value means the available data does not establish support. It is different from an explicit negative value.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.