Solana trading bot comparison
VS
Axiom Trade vs Trojan (Solana)
The leading recorded distinction: slippage control.
Quick verdict
The recorded difference in slippage control favors Trojan. The recorded settings are Manual for Axiom Trade and Advanced for Trojan.
Which bot should you choose
- For day-to-day use, the interface options differ: Axiom Trade lists PWA, Web; Trojan lists Telegram.
Bot rating summary
- Axiom Trade: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
- Trojan: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Feature | Axiom Trade | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Bot | Axiom Trade Review Open |
Trojan Review Open |
| Product description | High-speed Solana and BNB trading terminal built for migration sniping, scalping, perpetuals, wallet analytics, discovery tools and instant execution. | High-speed Solana Telegram trading bot with Trenches discovery, manual swaps, auto buy, auto sell profiles, copy trading, limit orders, DCA orders, auto sniping, migration sniping, bundle buys, Turbo and BOLT execution, wallet tools, and cashback rewards. |
| Active trading chains (product-wide) | SOL, BNB, ETH, Base, HyperEVM, Robinhood, Ink, Arc | SOL |
| Confirmed access surfaces | Web | Telegram |
| Interface languages | English | Not verified |
| Custody model | Non-custodial | Not verified |
| Cashback (eligible fees) | 5%–25% of eligible fees | Up to 20% of eligible fees |
| Platform trading fee | 1% | 1% |
| Execution focus | Speed First | Not verified |
| Priority / gas fee control | Manual | Not verified |
| Slippage control | Manual | Not verified |
| MEV protection | Yes | Not verified |
| Sniper | Yes | Yes |
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Token discovery | Integrated | Integrated |
| Copy trading | Not verified | Yes |
| Multi-wallet | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile experience | Good | Excellent |
| Preset support | Yes | Not verified |
| Editorial score | 4.9/5 | 4.9/5 |
| Beginner friendly | Medium | Medium |
| Setup time | 5 min | 3 min |
| Official links |
Fees comparison
Axiom Trade: 1%
Trojan: 1% | 20% cashback
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
- Within launchpad coverage, these entries distinguish the two lists: Axiom Trade: Bonk, Candle, Daos Fun, Liquidaf, Liquidaf Amm; Trojan: Bonk Fun, Liquid, Token Mill, Wavebreak. Shared entries are omitted here.
- Wallet tracking: Axiom Trade is listed as supported; Trojan as not supported.
Pro comparison
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
Execution & Speed
| Feature | Axiom Trade | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Execution focus | Speed First | Not verified |
| Priority / gas fee control | Manual | Not verified |
| MEV protection | Yes | Not verified |
| Take-profit | Yes | Yes |
| Stop-loss | Yes | Yes |
| Partial take-profit | Yes | Not verified |
| Partial stop-loss | Yes | Not verified |
| Wallet tracking | Yes | Not verified |
| Slippage control | Manual | Not verified |
| Launchpad discovery / execution relations | Mayhem (filter), Bags (filter), Bonk (filter), Bonkers (filter) +17 more confirmed | Not verified |
Discovery & Intelligence
| Feature | Axiom Trade | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery engine | Integrated | Integrated |
| Live feeds | New Pairs • Migration Tracker • Wallet Activity • Social Signals • Trending | Trenches Feed • New Pairs • Migration Tracker • Wallet Activity • Social Signals |
Trading & Automation
| Feature | Axiom Trade | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Auto sell | Yes | Yes |
| DCA orders | Yes | Yes |
| Sniping support | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | Not verified | Yes |
| Preset support | Yes | Not verified |
Wallet & Infrastructure
| Feature | Axiom Trade | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-wallet trading | Yes | Yes |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Supported wallets | Phantom • Solflare • Backpack • Rabby • Okx Wallet | None confirmed |
Market Coverage
| Feature | Axiom Trade | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Supported chains | SOL, BNB, ETH, Base, HyperEVM, Robinhood, Ink, Arc | SOL |
| DEX integrations | Pump Swap • Raydium • Orca • Meteora Amm • Meteora Amm V2 | Pump Amm • Raydium Amm • Raydium Clmm • Raydium V3 • Orca • Meteora Amm • Meteora Amm V2 • Meteora Dlmm • Vertigo • Fluxbeam |
| Routing partners | Jito | Not confirmed |
Rewards & Referral
| Feature | Axiom Trade | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Reward model (product-wide) | Hybrid | Cashback |
| Referral model (product-wide) | Revenue Share | Revenue Share |
| Referral reward type (product-wide) | Trading Fee Share | Trading Fee Share |
How to read this pro comparison
This comparison focuses on the parts of each product that matter most in practice, including routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
There is no universal latency ranking for Axiom Trade and Trojan, because execution outcomes depend on your environment, RPC setup and network state.
In practice, that means different traders can see very different results using the same product. For that reason, this comparison focuses on verified tooling and workflow structure rather than attempting to measure universal millisecond performance.
Final verdict
Each product has a recorded advantage. Base the choice on the requirement that matters most to your workflow.
Review links
Related comparisons
FAQ
Does an unlisted feature mean it is unsupported?
No. A missing value means the available data does not establish support. It is different from an explicit negative value.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.