Solana trading bot comparison
VS
Bloom vs Trojan Terminal (Solana)
Bloom has the tighter sniper profile on Solana, while Trojan Terminal is less centered on that specific type of execution.
Quick verdict
On Solana, Bloom lands better for faster-entry trading routines, while Trojan Terminal reads more like a broader general setup.
Which bot should you choose?
Here, workflow preference matters more than a simple checklist win.
Bloom lines up better if:
- You want a more sniper-oriented workflow
- You want a broader cross-chain workflow
- You prefer a faster Telegram-native trading flow
Trojan Terminal is usually the stronger match if:
- You rely on wallet tracking and trader research
- You care about cashback or lower effective trading costs
- You prefer a web-first workflow with mobile continuity
Bot rating summary
- Bloom: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
- Trojan Terminal: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Bot | Bloom Review Open |
Trojan Terminal Review Open |
| Description | Hybrid multi-chain trading stack with a Solana bot, EVM bot and browser extension overlay for spot trading, sniping, copy trading, AFK automation, Twitter auto-buy, limit orders and multi-wallet execution. | Advanced Solana trading terminal with Trenches discovery, Arena rewards, copy trading, wallet analytics, automated strategies and perpetual markets. |
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, HyperEVM | SOL |
| Best for | Copy Trading, Sniping, Telegram Trading, Multi-Chain Trading, Automation | Memecoin Trading, Copy Trading, Token Discovery, Wallet Tracking, Perpetual Trading |
| Interface | Telegram + Extension | Web + PWA |
| Languages | English, Chinese Simplified, Russian | English |
| Custody model | Bot Generated | Hybrid |
| Rebate / rewards | 10% cashback | 45% cashback |
| Trading fee | 1% | 1% |
| Execution focus | Speed First | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Advanced | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| MEV protection | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Sniper | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Limit orders | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Token discovery | Integrated | Integrated |
| Copy trading | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Multi-wallet | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Cross-chain workflow | ✔ Yes | ✖ No |
| Mobile experience | Good | Good |
| Preset support | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Editorial score | 4.8/5 | 4.9/5 |
| Beginner friendly | Medium | Medium |
| Setup time | 2 min | 5 min |
| Official links |
Fees comparison
Bloom: 1% | 10% cashback
Trojan Terminal: 1% | 45% cashback
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
Trojan Terminal stands out more when the workflow depends on tracking wallets and reading trader behavior.
Trojan Terminal is more discovery-led in daily use, while Bloom is less centered on that layer.
Bloom offers the deeper execution-tuning layer compared with Trojan Terminal.
Strengths and weaknesses
Bloom
Strengths
- Native copy trading support
- Multi-wallet trading support
- Built-in fee-savings angle
- Built around Telegram execution
Weaknesses
- Less wallet-intelligence depth
- Less flexible outside its main surface
Trojan Terminal
Strengths
- Native copy trading support
- Multi-wallet trading support
- Better address-level research workflow
- Some cost reduction beyond the base fee
Weaknesses
- Longer path to getting fully set up
Pro comparison
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
Execution & Speed
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Execution focus | Speed First | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Advanced | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| Retry handling | Basic | Not available |
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Private transactions | No | No |
Discovery & Intelligence
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery engine | Built-in discovery | Discovery + wallet intelligence |
| Trending tokens | Not available | Yes |
| Launchpad tracking | Pump.fun • Launchlab • Moonshot • Moon It • Boop +1 more | Pump.fun • Mayhem • Moon It • Launchlab • Bonk Fun +14 more |
Trading & Automation
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Auto sell | No | Yes |
| DCA orders | No | Yes |
| Sniping support | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | Yes | Yes |
| Preset support | Yes | Yes |
Wallet & Infrastructure
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-wallet trading | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet tracker | No | Yes |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Supported wallets | Internal Wallet | Wallet Connect |
| Interface workflow | Telegram + Extension | Web + PWA |
Market Coverage
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, HyperEVM | SOL |
| Cross-chain workflow | Yes | No |
| Launchpads | Pump Fun • LaunchLab • Moonshot • Moon It • Boop • Dynamic Bc | Pump Fun • Mayhem • Moon It • LaunchLab • Bonk Fun • Bonkers • Surge • Dynamic Bc • Believe • Moonshot +9 more |
How to read this pro comparison
Rather than surface-level features, this comparison focuses on deeper product differences like routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
Instead of fixed speed rankings, we acknowledge that execution performance for Bloom and Trojan Terminal varies depending on setup, RPC infrastructure and network conditions.
Rather than focusing on milliseconds, this comparison looks at how each product behaves in real workflows and trading setups.
Workflow and trading style
This is less about one killer feature and more about how the product fits into repeated trading. On Solana, Bloom is more tightly aligned with fast-entry sniper workflows, while Trojan Terminal leans more toward broader general trading flow.
Best choice by trader type
- Bloom: is the more natural pick if you want a more sniper-oriented workflow.
- Trojan Terminal: is the more natural pick if you rely on wallet tracking and trader research.
- Trojan Terminal: is usually the stronger fit when you care about cashback or lower effective trading costs.
Bloom vs Trojan Terminal: Which is better?
Bloom gets the nod overall because the broader product fit is stronger for traders who want the routine to stay closer to reactive execution. Trojan Terminal still makes sense if you prefer a less specialized flow.
Review links
Bloom
Hybrid multi-chain trading stack with a Solana bot, EVM bot and browser extension overlay for spot trading, sniping, copy trading, AFK automation, Twitter auto-buy, limit orders and multi-wallet execution.
referral_code: ref_2OO4W19C0G
Trojan Terminal
Advanced Solana trading terminal with Trenches discovery, Arena rewards, copy trading, wallet analytics, automated strategies and perpetual markets.
referral_code: soltbots
Related comparisons
FAQ
What is the difference between Bloom and Trojan Terminal?
Compared side by side, Bloom has the tighter fit for traders who want a more aggressive entry-oriented routine, while Trojan Terminal is broader in shape.
Which trading bot is better for beginners?
Beginners could make either option work here, but the easier fit depends on how much complexity you are comfortable with in the daily workflow.
Should I use Bloom or Trojan Terminal on this chain?
Bloom is the stronger overall option on Solana in this comparison, while Trojan Terminal can still make more sense if its workflow or interface suits you better.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.