Solana trading bot comparison
VS
MEVX vs Telemetry (Solana)
MEVX is more closely aligned with sniper-style execution on Solana, while Telemetry is the more general trading setup in this comparison.
Quick verdict
From a sniper-workflow angle, MEVX has the better overall fit, while Telemetry leans more toward broader trading flow.
Which bot should you choose?
This comparison is mostly about which workflow feels more natural in practice.
MEVX is easier to justify if:
- You want a more sniper-oriented workflow
- You want copy trading in the workflow
- You want stronger sniping support
Telemetry tends to fit better if:
- You want more control over execution, fees and trade settings
- You care about cashback or lower effective trading costs
Bot rating summary
- MEVX: ★★★★½ 4.7/5 (Very good)
- Telemetry: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Feature | MEVX | Telemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Bot | MEVX Review Open |
Telemetry Review Open |
| Description | Unified multi-chain Telegram trading bot with integrated sniping, manual trading, copy trading, DCA, limit orders, and multi-hop routing across Solana and EVM chains, with synchronized Telegram and web app execution. | Web-based Solana trading terminal powered by BONKbot Signer. Telemetry provides real-time discovery, wallet tracking, launchpad monitoring, automated strategies, TradingView charting, and high-speed execution. |
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, AVAX, MegaETH, Mantle, Monad, TON, TRON, Sui, Xlayer | SOL |
| Best for | Token Discovery, Sniping, Manual Trading, Copy Trading, Multi-Chain Trading | Web Trading Terminal, Launchpad Trading, Wallet Tracking, Token Discovery, High Speed Execution |
| Interface | Web + PWA + Telegram | Web + PWA |
| Languages | English, Chinese Simplified, Portuguese +4 | English, Chinese Simplified, Russian |
| Custody model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Rebate / rewards | 35% cashback | 25% cashback |
| Trading fee | 0.9% | 1% |
| Execution focus | Balanced | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Manual | Advanced |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| MEV protection | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Sniper | ✔ Yes | ✖ No |
| Limit orders | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Token discovery | Integrated | Advanced |
| Copy trading | ✔ Yes | ✖ No |
| Multi-wallet | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Cross-chain workflow | ✔ Yes | ✖ No |
| Mobile experience | Good | Good |
| Preset support | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Editorial score | 4.7/5 | 4.8/5 |
| Beginner friendly | Medium | Medium |
| Setup time | 10 min | 5 min |
| Official links |
Fees comparison
MEVX: 0.9% | 35% cashback
Telemetry: 1% | 25% cashback
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
MEVX is the only one of the two offering copy trading in this comparison.
Telemetry has the cleaner edge for traders who want tighter control over execution parameters.
Strengths and weaknesses
MEVX
Strengths
- Built-in copy trading workflow
- Better suited to multi-wallet routines
- Built-in wallet monitoring
- Built-in fee-savings angle
Weaknesses
- Takes longer to get configured
Telemetry
Strengths
- Better suited to multi-wallet routines
- Useful wallet-tracking workflow
- Some cost reduction beyond the base fee
- Quicker setup flow
Weaknesses
- No copy trading support
- Less suited to sniper-style trading
Pro comparison
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
Execution & Speed
| Feature | MEVX | Telemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Execution focus | Balanced | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Manual | Advanced |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| Retry handling | Basic | Basic |
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Private transactions | No | No |
Discovery & Intelligence
| Feature | MEVX | Telemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery engine | Discovery + wallet intelligence | Discovery + wallet intelligence |
| Trending tokens | Yes | Yes |
| Launchpad tracking | Pump.fun • LetsBONK • Mayhem • Wen Dev • Daos Fun +12 more | Pump.fun • Mayhem • Moon It • Launchlab • Bonk Fun +14 more |
Trading & Automation
| Feature | MEVX | Telemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Auto sell | Yes | Yes |
| DCA orders | Yes | Yes |
| Sniping support | Yes | No |
| Copy trading | Yes | No |
| Preset support | Yes | Yes |
Wallet & Infrastructure
| Feature | MEVX | Telemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-wallet trading | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet tracker | Yes | Yes |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Supported wallets | Internal Wallet | Phantom |
| Interface workflow | Web + PWA + Telegram | Web + PWA |
Market Coverage
| Feature | MEVX | Telemetry |
|---|---|---|
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, AVAX, MegaETH, Mantle, Monad, TON, TRON, Sui, Xlayer | SOL |
| Cross-chain workflow | Yes | No |
| Launchpads | Pump Fun • LetsBONK • Mayhem • Wen Dev • Daos Fun • Believe • Moon It • Jupiter Studio • Bags • Printr +7 more | Pump Fun • Mayhem • Moon It • LaunchLab • Bonk Fun • Bonkers • Surge • Dynamic Bc • Believe • Moonshot +9 more |
How to read this pro comparison
This advanced comparison highlights the product-level differences that matter most to active on-chain traders, including routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
There is no fixed latency ranking for MEVX and Telemetry, because real execution speed varies based on your setup, RPC choice, region, device performance and current network conditions.
In practice, the same tool can perform differently depending on setup. This is why we compare workflow structure and tooling rather than claiming fixed speed differences.
Workflow and trading style
In practice, this compare is more about routine fit than surface-level capability. On Solana, MEVX is more tightly aligned with fast-entry sniper workflows, while Telemetry leans more toward broader general trading flow.
Best choice by trader type
- MEVX: is the more convincing fit when you want a more sniper-oriented workflow.
- Telemetry: is the more convincing fit when you want more control over execution, fees and trade settings.
- Telemetry: is the better directional choice if you care about cashback or lower effective trading costs.
MEVX vs Telemetry: Which is better?
On balance, MEVX is the stronger answer in this matchup because the day-to-day workflow is better aligned with quicker entry conditions. Telemetry remains a valid option if you want something broader.
Review links
MEVX
Unified multi-chain Telegram trading bot with integrated sniping, manual trading, copy trading, DCA, limit orders, and multi-hop routing across Solana and EVM chains, with synchronized Telegram and web app execution.
referral_code: Tradingbots
Telemetry
Web-based Solana trading terminal powered by BONKbot Signer. Telemetry provides real-time discovery, wallet tracking, launchpad monitoring, automated strategies, TradingView charting, and high-speed execution.
referral_code: @ffck2
Related comparisons
FAQ
What is the difference between MEVX and Telemetry?
In this matchup, MEVX is more naturally shaped around faster entry conditions, while Telemetry reads more like a broader general trading setup.
Which trading bot is better for beginners?
Neither option clearly dominates for beginners here. The easier fit comes down more to workflow preference than to one product being universally simpler.
Should I use MEVX or Telemetry on this chain?
MEVX is the better overall fit on Solana in this comparison, while Telemetry is still worth considering if its trading flow matches your preferences.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.