Solana trading bot comparison
VS
MEVX vs Trojan (Solana)
For traders on Solana who care most about reactive entries, MEVX comes into this comparison with the clearer sniper angle.
Quick verdict
For more reactive entry styles on Solana, MEVX comes together better than Trojan as a day-to-day trading setup.
Which bot should you choose?
Both options can work, but the right pick depends on your routine and priorities.
Go with MEVX if:
- You want a more sniper-oriented workflow
- You rely on wallet tracking or trader-intelligence workflows
- You want stronger built-in discovery and opportunity flow
Trojan is easier to justify if:
- You care about cashback or lower effective trading costs
- You prefer a faster and simpler Telegram-first workflow
Bot rating summary
- MEVX: ★★★★½ 4.7/5 (Very good)
- Trojan: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Bot | MEVX Review Open |
Trojan Review Open |
| Description | Unified multi-chain Telegram trading bot with integrated sniping, manual trading, copy trading, DCA, limit orders, and multi-hop routing across Solana and EVM chains, with synchronized Telegram and web app execution. | High-speed Solana Telegram trading bot with Trenches discovery, manual swaps, auto buy, auto sell profiles, copy trading, limit orders, DCA orders, auto sniping, migration sniping, bundle buys, Turbo and BOLT execution, wallet tools, and cashback rewards. |
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, AVAX, MegaETH, Mantle, Monad, TON, TRON, Sui, Xlayer | SOL |
| Best for | Token Discovery, Sniping, Manual Trading, Copy Trading, Multi-Chain Trading | Sniping, Fast Execution, Trenches Discovery, Copy Trading, Telegram Trading |
| Interface | Web + PWA + Telegram | Telegram |
| Languages | English, Chinese Simplified, Portuguese +4 | English, Chinese Simplified, Russian +3 |
| Custody model | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Rebate / rewards | 35% cashback | 20% cashback |
| Trading fee | 0.9% | 1% |
| Execution focus | Balanced | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Manual | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| MEV protection | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Sniper | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Limit orders | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Token discovery | Integrated | Integrated |
| Copy trading | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Multi-wallet | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Cross-chain workflow | ✔ Yes | ✖ No |
| Mobile experience | Good | Excellent |
| Preset support | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Editorial score | 4.7/5 | 4.9/5 |
| Beginner friendly | Medium | Medium |
| Setup time | 10 min | 3 min |
| Official links |
Fees comparison
MEVX: 0.9% | 35% cashback
Trojan: 1% | 20% cashback
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
MEVX is the more research-oriented product for wallet tracking and trader analysis in this matchup.
MEVX has the more discovery-forward setup, while Trojan is lighter on built-in opportunity flow.
Strengths and weaknesses
MEVX
Strengths
- Copy trading support
- Supports multi-wallet execution
- Wallet tracking and trader research
- Built-in fee-savings angle
Weaknesses
- Slower setup flow
- More limited execution control
Trojan
Strengths
- Copy trading support
- Supports multi-wallet execution
- Some cost reduction beyond the base fee
- Better execution-settings depth
Weaknesses
- Weaker wallet-research layer
- Not as broad in interface coverage
Pro comparison
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
Execution & Speed
| Feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Execution focus | Balanced | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Manual | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| Retry handling | Basic | Advanced |
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Private transactions | No | Yes |
Discovery & Intelligence
| Feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery engine | Discovery + wallet intelligence | Discovery + wallet intelligence |
| Trending tokens | Yes | Not available |
| Launchpad tracking | Pump.fun • LetsBONK • Mayhem • Wen Dev • Daos Fun +12 more | Pump.fun • Mayhem • Moon It • Launchlab • Bonk Fun +14 more |
Trading & Automation
| Feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Auto sell | Yes | Yes |
| DCA orders | Yes | Yes |
| Sniping support | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | Yes | Yes |
| Preset support | Yes | Yes |
Wallet & Infrastructure
| Feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-wallet trading | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet tracker | Yes | No |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Supported wallets | Internal Wallet | Internal Wallet |
| Interface workflow | Web + PWA + Telegram | Telegram |
Market Coverage
| Feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, AVAX, MegaETH, Mantle, Monad, TON, TRON, Sui, Xlayer | SOL |
| Cross-chain workflow | Yes | No |
| Launchpads | Pump Fun • LetsBONK • Mayhem • Wen Dev • Daos Fun • Believe • Moon It • Jupiter Studio • Bags • Printr +7 more | Pump Fun • Mayhem • Moon It • LaunchLab • Bonk Fun • Bonkers • Surge • Dynamic Bc • Believe • Moonshot +9 more |
How to read this pro comparison
This comparison focuses on the parts of each product that matter most in practice, including routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
There is no universal latency ranking for MEVX and Trojan, because execution outcomes depend on your environment, RPC setup and network state.
In practice, that means different traders can see very different results using the same product. For that reason, this comparison focuses on verified tooling and workflow structure rather than attempting to measure universal millisecond performance.
Workflow and trading style
The difference here is mostly about which routine the product naturally supports. On Solana, MEVX is more tightly aligned with fast-entry sniper workflows, while Trojan leans more toward broader general trading flow.
Best choice by trader type
- MEVX: comes into focus more clearly when you want a more sniper-oriented workflow.
- MEVX: is usually the cleaner answer if you rely on wallet tracking or trader-intelligence workflows.
- Trojan: comes into focus more clearly when you care about cashback or lower effective trading costs.
- Trojan: is usually the cleaner answer if you prefer a faster and simpler Telegram-first workflow.
MEVX vs Trojan: Which is better?
Taken as a full Solana workflow, MEVX makes more sense here because the product is shaped more naturally around reactive entry trading. Trojan still works if you prefer a less entry-driven setup.
Review links
MEVX
Unified multi-chain Telegram trading bot with integrated sniping, manual trading, copy trading, DCA, limit orders, and multi-hop routing across Solana and EVM chains, with synchronized Telegram and web app execution.
referral_code: Tradingbots
Trojan
High-speed Solana Telegram trading bot with Trenches discovery, manual swaps, auto buy, auto sell profiles, copy trading, limit orders, DCA orders, auto sniping, migration sniping, bundle buys, Turbo and BOLT execution, wallet tools, and cashback rewards.
referral_code: r-sanderb4mr1cn
Related comparisons
FAQ
What is the difference between MEVX and Trojan?
MEVX has the clearer fast-entry shape in this comparison, while Trojan feels broader and less centered on that execution pattern.
Which trading bot is better for beginners?
For beginners, this is not a one-sided comparison. The better starting point depends on whether you want a simpler routine or a broader feature set.
Should I use MEVX or Trojan on this chain?
Overall, this comparison on Solana leans toward MEVX, although Trojan can still work better for you if its structure fits your routine more closely.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.