Solana trading bot comparison
VS
MEVX vs Trojan (Solana)
Compare confirmed Solana controls and their documented scope.
Quick verdict
The confirmed overlap does not establish an overall winner.
Bot rating summary
- MEVX: ★★★★½ 4.7/5 (Very good)
- Trojan: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Confirmed feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Bot | MEVX Review Open |
Trojan Review Open |
| Copy trading | Yes | Yes |
| DCA orders | Yes | Yes |
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Confirmed access surfaces | Web + Telegram + Browser extension | Telegram |
| Platform trading fee | 0.90% Beginner; 0.70% Diamond | 1% |
| Interface languages | Web: English, Simplified Chinese, Portuguese, Russian +3 more confirmed | Not verified |
| Sniping support | Yes | Yes |
| Multiple wallets | Yes | Yes |
Fees comparison
MEVX: 0.90% at Beginner rank, falling to 0.70% at Diamond; cashback may reduce effective cost further.
Trojan: 1% | 20% cashback
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
- Within launchpad coverage, these entries distinguish the two lists: MEVX: Bankr, Daos Fun, LetsBONK, Printr, Wen Dev; Trojan: Bonk Fun, Bonkers, Boop, Liquid, Soar, Token Mill, Wavebreak. Shared entries are omitted here.
- Wallet tracking: MEVX is listed as supported; Trojan as not supported.
Confirmed controls and integrations
| Confirmed feature | MEVX | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Automated sells | Yes | Yes |
| Take-profit | Yes | Yes |
| Stop-loss | Yes | Yes |
| Partial take-profit | Yes | Not verified |
| Partial stop-loss | Yes | Not verified |
| MEV protection | Yes | Not verified |
| Slippage control | Manual | Not verified |
| Priority / gas fee control | Manual | Not verified |
| Launchpad discovery / execution relations | Pump.fun (sniper), Pump.fun (filter), Mayhem (filter), Wen Dev (filter) +27 more confirmed | Not verified |
| Reward model (product-wide) | Hybrid | Cashback |
| Referral model (product-wide) | Revenue Share | Revenue Share |
| DCA orders | Yes | Yes |
| Preset support | Yes | Not verified |
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
This comparison focuses on the parts of each product that matter most in practice, including routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
There is no universal latency ranking for MEVX and Trojan, because execution outcomes depend on your environment, RPC setup and network state.
In practice, that means different traders can see very different results using the same product. For that reason, this comparison focuses on verified tooling and workflow structure rather than attempting to measure universal millisecond performance.
Each product has a recorded advantage. Base the choice on the requirement that matters most to your workflow.
MEVX fee and scope
0.90% at Beginner rank, falling to 0.70% at Diamond; cashback may reduce effective cost further.
The gross platform fee follows the account rank across active chains. Cashback is a share of eligible fees; referral commission is a separate benefit. Network gas, priority fees, validator tips and DEX/protocol charges are additional where applicable.
Only confirmed overlap is included in the comparison tables. Omitted rows do not mean unsupported. Launchpad filters do not establish trade or sniper support. MEVX custody, wallet-import availability and shared account history remain unresolved.
Review links
Related comparisons
FAQ
Does an unlisted feature mean it is unsupported?
No. A missing value means the available data does not establish support. It is different from an explicit negative value.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.