Solana trading bot comparison
VS
Axiom Trade vs Bloom (Solana)
Quick verdict
Equal confirmed feature score. The mutually confirmed features do not produce a unique feature leader.
- Interface languages: Axiom Trade — English · Web; Bloom — English, Simplified Chinese, Russian · Telegram.
Bot rating summary
- Axiom Trade: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
- Bloom: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Confirmed feature | Axiom Trade | Bloom |
|---|---|---|
| Platform trading fee | 1% | 1% |
| Interface languages | English | English, Simplified Chinese, Russian |
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Confirmed access surfaces | Web | Telegram + Web + Pwa + Browser extension |
| Copy trading | Not verified | Yes |
| Sniping support | Yes | Yes |
| Multiple wallets | Yes | Yes |
Fees comparison
Axiom Trade: 1%
Bloom fees
Bloom’s standard token buy/sell fee is 1%. Signing up through a referral reduces that platform fee to 0.9%. Network gas, priority fees or validator tips, protocol/DEX costs and bridge fees are separate. Referred cashback is 10% of eligible standard fees; the net result when combined with the discount remains unconfirmed.
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
- Comparing wallet tracking, Axiom Trade is recorded as supported and Bloom as not supported.
Bloom on Solana
The Solana bot combines liquidity/migration sniping, wallet copy trading, AFK platform matching and Social tasks. These are different execution workflows: an AFK platform filter does not establish a sniper integration for that launchpad. Partial exits, take profit, stop loss and trailing strategies are documented.
The Solana settings separate buy/sell network fees from validator tips, with Auto Tip and slippage controls. Protected-processor routing is configurable; a protection control does not guarantee a sandwich-free fill. The quote menu offers SOL, USDC and USD1.
Confirmed controls and integrations
| Confirmed feature | Axiom Trade | Bloom |
|---|---|---|
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Priority / gas fee control | Manual | Manual |
| Slippage control | Manual | Manual |
| Launchpad discovery / execution relations | Mayhem (filter), Bags (filter), Bonk (filter), Bonkers (filter) +17 more confirmed | Pump.fun (trade), Launchlab (trade), Moonshot (trade), Moon It (trade) +22 more confirmed |
| Multiple wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Automated sells | Yes | Yes |
| Partial stop-loss | Yes | Yes |
| Partial take-profit | Yes | Yes |
| Trailing stop-loss | Yes · Web | Yes |
| Take-profit | Yes | Yes |
| Stop-loss | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet tracking | Yes | Not verified |
| Reward model (product-wide) | Hybrid | Cashback |
| Referral model (product-wide) | Revenue Share | Multi Level |
| DCA orders | Yes | Not verified |
| Preset support | Yes | Yes |
Instead of feature checklists, this comparison highlights structural differences like routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
We do not treat execution speed as a static metric for Axiom Trade and Bloom, since it depends on setup quality, RPC choice, region and network load.
In real conditions, performance differences depend on setup quality. That is why we focus on workflow and tooling instead of fixed execution-speed claims.
Review links
Related comparisons
FAQ
Does an unlisted feature mean it is unsupported?
No. A missing value means the available data does not establish support. It is different from an explicit negative value.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.