Solana trading bot comparison
VS
Bloom vs Trojan (Solana)
Bloom is more closely aligned with sniper-style execution on Solana, while Trojan is the more general trading setup in this comparison.
Quick verdict
From a sniper-workflow angle, Bloom has the better overall fit, while Trojan leans more toward broader trading flow.
Which bot should you choose?
This comparison is mostly about which workflow feels more natural in practice.
Bloom is easier to justify if:
- You want a more sniper-oriented workflow
- You want a broader cross-chain workflow
- You want more control over execution, fees and trade settings
Trojan tends to fit better if:
- You care about cashback or lower effective trading costs
- You prefer a faster and simpler Telegram-first workflow
Bot rating summary
- Bloom: ★★★★½ 4.8/5 (Excellent)
- Trojan: ★★★★½ 4.9/5 (Excellent)
Feature comparison
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Bot | Bloom Review Open |
Trojan Review Open |
| Description | Hybrid multi-chain trading stack with a Solana bot, EVM bot and browser extension overlay for spot trading, sniping, copy trading, AFK automation, Twitter auto-buy, limit orders and multi-wallet execution. | High-speed Solana Telegram trading bot with Trenches discovery, manual swaps, auto buy, auto sell profiles, copy trading, limit orders, DCA orders, auto sniping, migration sniping, bundle buys, Turbo and BOLT execution, wallet tools, and cashback rewards. |
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, HyperEVM | SOL |
| Best for | Copy Trading, Sniping, Telegram Trading, Multi-Chain Trading, Automation | Sniping, Fast Execution, Trenches Discovery, Copy Trading, Telegram Trading |
| Interface | Telegram + Extension | Telegram |
| Languages | English, Chinese Simplified, Russian | English, Chinese Simplified, Russian +3 |
| Custody model | Bot Generated | Hybrid |
| Rebate / rewards | 10% cashback | 20% cashback |
| Trading fee | 1% | 1% |
| Execution focus | Speed First | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Advanced | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| MEV protection | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Sniper | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Limit orders | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Token discovery | Integrated | Integrated |
| Copy trading | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Multi-wallet | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Cross-chain workflow | ✔ Yes | ✖ No |
| Mobile experience | Good | Excellent |
| Preset support | ✔ Yes | ✔ Yes |
| Editorial score | 4.8/5 | 4.9/5 |
| Beginner friendly | Medium | Medium |
| Setup time | 2 min | 3 min |
| Official links |
Fees comparison
Bloom: 1% | 10% cashback
Trojan: 1% | 20% cashback
Trading fees are only part of the real cost. Cashback, referral rewards or discounted fee structures can make one bot more cost-efficient over time depending on how often you trade.
Key differences
Bloom has the cleaner edge for traders who want tighter control over execution parameters.
Strengths and weaknesses
Bloom
Strengths
- Built-in copy trading workflow
- Better suited to multi-wallet routines
- Built-in fee-savings angle
- Extension-based workflow support
Weaknesses
- Less configurable around fee and execution tuning
Trojan
Strengths
- Built-in copy trading workflow
- Better suited to multi-wallet routines
- Some cost reduction beyond the base fee
- Stronger control over fees and trade setup
Weaknesses
- Fewer standout trade-offs in this matchup
Pro comparison
This advanced comparison focuses on deeper product differences that matter more to active traders, such as execution controls, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and market access.
Execution & Speed
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Execution focus | Speed First | Speed First |
| Priority fee control | Advanced | Manual |
| Slippage control | Advanced | Advanced |
| Retry handling | Basic | Advanced |
| MEV protection | Yes | Yes |
| Private transactions | No | Yes |
Discovery & Intelligence
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery engine | Built-in discovery | Discovery + wallet intelligence |
| Launchpad tracking | Pump.fun • Launchlab • Moonshot • Moon It • Boop +1 more | Pump.fun • Mayhem • Moon It • Launchlab • Bonk Fun +14 more |
Trading & Automation
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Limit orders | Yes | Yes |
| Auto sell | No | Yes |
| DCA orders | No | Yes |
| Sniping support | Yes | Yes |
| Copy trading | Yes | Yes |
| Preset support | Yes | Yes |
Wallet & Infrastructure
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-wallet trading | Yes | Yes |
| Wallet tracker | No | No |
| Internal wallets | Yes | Yes |
| Supported wallets | Internal Wallet | Internal Wallet |
| Interface workflow | Telegram + Extension | Telegram |
Market Coverage
| Feature | Bloom | Trojan |
|---|---|---|
| Supported chains | SOL, ETH, BNB, Base, HyperEVM | SOL |
| Cross-chain workflow | Yes | No |
| Launchpads | Pump Fun • LaunchLab • Moonshot • Moon It • Boop • Dynamic Bc | Pump Fun • Mayhem • Moon It • LaunchLab • Bonk Fun • Bonkers • Surge • Dynamic Bc • Believe • Moonshot +9 more |
How to read this pro comparison
Instead of feature checklists, this comparison highlights structural differences like routing depth, discovery tooling, wallet intelligence, launch coverage and execution controls on Solana.
We do not treat execution speed as a static metric for Bloom and Trojan, since it depends on setup quality, RPC choice, region and network load.
In real conditions, performance differences depend on setup quality. That is why we focus on workflow and tooling instead of fixed execution-speed claims.
Workflow and trading style
For traders actually using these tools every day, workflow fit matters more than feature headlines. On Solana, Bloom is more tightly aligned with fast-entry sniper workflows, while Trojan leans more toward broader general trading flow.
Best choice by trader type
- Bloom: is easier to justify if you want a more sniper-oriented workflow.
- Trojan: is easier to justify if you care about cashback or lower effective trading costs.
- Trojan: is often the better match when you prefer a faster and simpler Telegram-first workflow.
Bloom vs Trojan: Which is better?
On balance, Bloom is the stronger answer in this matchup because the day-to-day workflow is better aligned with quicker entry conditions. Trojan remains a valid option if you want something broader.
Review links
Bloom
Hybrid multi-chain trading stack with a Solana bot, EVM bot and browser extension overlay for spot trading, sniping, copy trading, AFK automation, Twitter auto-buy, limit orders and multi-wallet execution.
referral_code: ref_2OO4W19C0G
Trojan
High-speed Solana Telegram trading bot with Trenches discovery, manual swaps, auto buy, auto sell profiles, copy trading, limit orders, DCA orders, auto sniping, migration sniping, bundle buys, Turbo and BOLT execution, wallet tools, and cashback rewards.
referral_code: r-sanderb4mr1cn
Related comparisons
FAQ
What is the difference between Bloom and Trojan?
In this matchup, Bloom is more naturally shaped around faster entry conditions, while Trojan reads more like a broader general trading setup.
Which trading bot is better for beginners?
Neither option clearly dominates for beginners here. The easier fit comes down more to workflow preference than to one product being universally simpler.
Should I use Bloom or Trojan on this chain?
Bloom is the better overall fit on Solana in this comparison, while Trojan is still worth considering if its trading flow matches your preferences.
Compare more trading bots
Looking for other trading tools? Use the interactive comparison tool on the homepage to compare more trading terminals or bots side by side.